THE UNITED STATES IN 1850.
XI
SLAVERY IN THE TERRITORIES, 1844-1859
Books for Study and Reading
References.--Scribner's Popular History, IV;
McMaster's With the Fathers, Coffin's Building the
Nation, 314-324.
Home Readings.--Wright's Stories of American
Progress; Bolton's Famous Americans; Brooks's Boy
Settlers; Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin; Lodge's
Webster.
CHAPTER 31
BEGINNING OF THE ANTISLAVERY AGITATION
Antislavery sentiments of the Virginians.
Slavery in the far South.
Source-book, 244-248, 251-260.
323. Growth of Slavery in the South.--South of
Pennsylvania and of the Ohio River slavery had increased greatly
since 1787 (p. 136). Washington, Jefferson, Henry, and other great
Virginians were opposed to the slave system. But they could find no
way to end it, even in Virginia. The South Carolinians and
Georgians fought every proposition to limit slavery. They even
refused to come into the Union unless they were given
representation in Congress for a portion at least of their slaves.
And in the first Congress under the Constitution they opposed
bitterly every proposal to limit slavery. Then came Whitney's
invention of the cotton gin. That at once made slave labor vastly
more profitable in the cotton states and put an end to all hopes of
peaceful emancipation in the South.
Proposal to end slavery with compensation.
The Liberator.
324. Rise of the Abolitionists.--About 1830 a new
movement in favor of the negroes began. Some persons in the North,
as, for example, William Ellery Channing, proposed that slaves
should be set free, and their owners paid for their loss. They
suggested that the money received from the sale of the public lands
might be used in this way. But nothing came of these suggestions.
Soon, however, William Lloyd Garrison began at Boston the
publication of a paper called the Liberator. He wished for
complete abolition without payment. For a time he labored almost
alone. Then slowly others came to his aid, and the Antislavery
Society was founded.
Anti-abolitionist sentiment in the North.
Higginson, 268.
Disunion sentiment of abolitionists.
The Garrison riot, 1835. Source-Book, 248-251.
325. Opposition to the Abolitionists.--It must not be
thought that the abolitionists were not opposed. They were most
vigorously opposed. Very few Northern men wished to have slavery
reestablished in the North. But very many Northern men objected to
the antislavery agitation because they thought it would injure
business. Some persons even argued that the antislavery movement
would bring about the destruction of the Union. In this idea there
was a good deal of truth. For Garrison grew more and more
outspoken. He condemned the Union with slaveholders and wished to
break down the Constitution, because it permitted slavery. There
were anti-abolitionist riots in New York, New Jersey, and New
Hampshire. In Boston the rioters seized Garrison and dragged him
about the streets (1835).
Nat Turner's Rebellion, 1831.
Incendiary publications in the mails. McMaster, 313-314.
326. Slave Rebellion in Virginia, 1831.--At about the
time that Garrison established the Liberator at Boston, a
slave rebellion broke out in Virginia. The rebels were led by a
slave named Nat Turner, and the rebellion is often called "Nat
Turner's Rebellion." It was a small affair and was easily put down.
But the Southerners were alarmed, because they felt that the
Northern antislavery agitation would surely lead to more
rebellions. They called upon the government to forbid the sending
of the Liberator and similar "incendiary publications"
through the mails.
Right of petition.
J.Q. Adams and antislavery petitions, 1836. Hero Tales,
151-159.
The "gag-resolutions." McMaster, 314-315.
327. The Right of Petition.--One of the most sacred
rights of freemen is the right to petition for redress of
grievances. In the old colonial days the British Parliament had
refused even to listen to petitions presented by the colonists. But
the First Amendment to the Constitution forbade Congress to make
any law to prevent citizens of the United States from petitioning.
John Quincy Adams, once President, was now a member of the House of
Representatives. In 1836 he presented petition after petition,
praying Congress to forbid slavery in the District of Columbia.
Southerners, like Calhoun, thought these petitions were insulting
to Southern slaveholders. Congress could not prevent the
antislavery people petitioning. They could prevent the petitions
being read when presented. This they did by passing
"gag-resolutions." Adams protested against these resolutions as an
infringement on the rights of his constituents. But the resolutions
were passed. Petitions now came pouring into Congress. Adams even
presented one from some negro slaves.
Growth of antislavery feeling in the North.
328. Change in Northern Sentiment.--All these happenings
brought about a great change of sentiment in the North. Many
people, who cared little about negro slaves, cared a great deal
about the freedom of the press and the right of petition. Many of
these did not sympathize with the abolitionists, but they wished
that some limit might be set to the extension of slavery. At the
same time the Southerners were uniting to resist all attempts to
interfere with slavery. They were even determined to add new slave
territory to the United States.
CHAPTER 32
THE MEXICAN WAR
The Mexican Republic, 1821.
Texas secedes from Mexico, 1836, McMaster, 320-322; Hero
Tales, 173-181.
329. The Republic of Texas.--The Mexicans won their
independence from Spain in 1821 and founded the Mexican Republic.
Soon immigrants from the United States settled in the northeastern
part of the new republic. This region was called Texas. The Mexican
government gave these settlers large tracts of land, and for a time
everything went on happily. Then war broke out between the Mexicans
and the Texans. Led by Samuel Houston, a settler from Tennessee,
the Texans won the battle of San Jacinto and captured General Santa
Anna, the president of the Mexican Republic. The Texans then
established the Republic of Texas (1836) and asked to be admitted
to the Union as one of the United States.
Question of the admission of Texas to the
Union.
330. The Southerners and Texas.--The application of Texas
for admission to the Union came as a pleasant surprise to many
Southerners. As a part of the Mexican Republic Texas had been free
soil. But Texas was well suited to the needs of the cotton plant.
If it were admitted to the Union, it would surely be a slave state
or, perhaps, several slave states. The question of admitting Texas
first came before Jackson. He saw that the admission of Texas would
be strongly opposed in the North. So he put the whole matter to one
side and would have nothing to do with it. Tyler acted very
differently. Under his direction a treaty was made with Texas. This
treaty provided for the admission of Texas to the Union. But the
Senate refused to ratify the treaty. The matter, therefore, became
the most important question in the presidential election of
1844.
[Illustration: JAMES K. POLK.]
Candidates for the presidency, 1844.
The Liberty party.
Polk elected.
331. Election of 1844.--President Tyler would have been
glad of a second term. But neither of the great parties wanted him
as a leader. The Democrats would have gladly nominated Van Buren
had he not opposed the acquisition of Texas. Instead they nominated
James K. Polk of Tennessee, an outspoken favorer of the admission
of Texas. The Whigs nominated Henry Clay, who had no decided views
on the Texas question. He said one thing one day, another thing
another day. The result was that the opponents of slavery and of
Texas formed a new party. They called it the Liberty party and
nominated a candidate for President. The Liberty men did not gain
many votes. But they gained enough votes to make Clay's election
impossible and Polk was chosen President.
Texas admitted by joint resolution, 1845.
McMaster, 325.
332. Acquisition of Texas, 1845.--Tyler now pressed the
admission of Texas upon Congress. The two houses passed a joint
resolution. This resolution provided for the admission of Texas,
and for the formation from the territory included in Texas of four
states, in addition to the state of Texas, and with the consent of
that state. Before Texas was actually admitted Tyler had ceased to
be President. But Polk carried out his policy, and on July 4, 1845,
Texas became one of the United States.
Southern boundary of Texas.
Taylor on the Rio Grande.
War declared, 1846. Lowell in Source-Book, 271-276.
333. Beginning of the Mexican War, 1846.--The Mexicans
had never acknowledged the independence of Texas. They now
protested against its admission to the United States. Disputes also
arose as to the southern boundary of Texas. As no agreement could
be reached on this point, President Polk ordered General Zachary
Taylor to march to the Rio Grande and occupy the disputed
territory. Taylor did as he was ordered, and the Mexicans attacked
him. Polk reported these facts to Congress, and Congress authorized
the President to push on the fighting on the ground that "war
exists, and exists by the act of Mexico herself."
The three parts of the Mexican War.
Taylor's campaign. McMaster, 326-327.
Battle of Buena Vista, 1847.
334. Taylor's Campaigns.--The Mexican War easily divides
itself into three parts: (1) Taylor's forward movement across the
Rio Grande; (2) Scott's campaign, which ended in the capture of the
City of Mexico; and (3) the seizure of California. Taylor's object
was to maintain the line of the Rio Grande, then to advance into
Mexico and injure the Mexicans as much as possible. The battles of
Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma (May 8, 9, 1846) were fought
before the actual declaration of war. These victories made Taylor
master of the Rio Grande. In September he crossed the Rio Grande.
So far all had gone well. But in the winter many of Taylor's
soldiers were withdrawn to take part in Scott's campaign. This
seemed to be the Mexicans' time. They attacked Taylor with four
times as many men as he had in his army. This battle was fought at
Buena Vista, February, 1847. Taylor beat back the Mexicans with
terrible slaughter. This was the last battle of Taylor's
campaign.
Scott's campaign. Eggleston, 284-286;
McMaster, 327-328.
He captures City of Mexico, 1847.
335. Scott's Invasion of Mexico.--The plan of Scott's
campaign was that he should land at Vera Cruz, march to the city of
Mexico,--two hundred miles away,--capture that city, and force the
Mexicans to make peace. Everything fell out precisely as it was
planned. With the help of the navy Scott captured Vera Cruz. He had
only about one-quarter as many men as the Mexicans. But he
overthrew them at Cerro Gordo, where the road to the City of Mexico
crosses the coast mountains (April, 1847). With the greatest care
and skill he pressed on and at length came within sight of the City
of Mexico. The capital of the Mexican Republic stood in the midst
of marshes, and could be reached only over narrow causeways which
joined it to the solid land. August 20, 1847, Scott beat the
Mexicans in three pitched battles, and on September 14 he entered
the city with his army, now numbering only six thousand men fit for
active service.
[Illustration: THE BEAR FLAG.]
California.
The "Bear Republic," 1846.
California seized by American soldiers.
336. Seizure of California.--California was the name
given to the Mexican possessions on the Pacific coast north of
Mexico itself. There were now many American settlers there,
especially at Monterey. Hearing of the outbreak of the Mexican War,
they Set up a republic of their own. Their flag had a figure of a
grizzly bear painted on it, and hence their republic is often
spoken of as the Bear Republic. Commodore Stockton with a small
fleet was on the Pacific coast. He and John C. Frémont
assisted the Bear Republicans until soldiers under Colonel Kearney
reached them from the United States by way of Santa Fé.
[Illustration: JOHN C. FRÉMONT.]
Mexican cessions, 1848.
The Gadsden Purchase, 1853. McMaster, 334.
337. Treaty of Peace, 1848.--The direct cause of the
Mexican War was Mexico's unwillingness to give up Texas without a
struggle. But the Mexicans had treated many Americans very unjustly
and owed them large sums of money. A treaty of peace was made in
1848. Mexico agreed to abandon her claims to Texas, California, New
Mexico, Nevada, Utah, and Colorado. The United States agreed to
withdraw its armies from Mexico, to pay Mexico fifteen million
dollars, and to pay the claims of American citizens on Mexico.
These claims proved to amount to three and one-half million
dollars, In the end, therefore, the United States paid eighteen and
one-half million dollars for this enormous and exceedingly valuable
addition to its territory. When the time came to run the boundary
line, the American and Mexican commissioners could not agree. So
the United States paid ten million dollars more and received an
additional strip of land between the Rio Grande and the Colorado
rivers. This gave the United States its present southern boundary.
This agreement was made in 1853 by James Gadsden for the United
States, and the land bought is usually called the Gadsden
Purchase.
Oregon.
Joint occupation by United States and Great Britain.
338. The Oregon Question.--It was not only in the
Southwest that boundaries were disputed; in the Northwest also
there was a long controversy which was settled while Polk was
President. Oregon was the name given to the whole region, between
Spanish and Mexican California and the Russian Alaska. The United
States and Great Britain each claimed to have the best right to
Oregon. As they could not agree as to their claims, they decided to
occupy the region jointly. As time went on American settlers and
missionaries began to go over the mountains to Oregon. In 1847
seven thousand Americans were living in the Northwest.
"All Oregon or none."
Division of Oregon, 1846.
339. The Oregon Treaty, 1846.--The matter was now taken
up in earnest. "All Oregon or none," "Fifty-four forty or fight,"
became popular cries. The United States gave notice of the ending
of the joint occupation. The British government suggested that
Oregon should be divided between the two nations. In 1818 he
boundary between the United States and British North America had
been fixed as the forty-ninth parallel from the Lake of the Woods
to the Rocky Mountains. It was now proposed to continue this line
to the Pacific. The British government, however, insisted that the
western end of the line should follow the channel between
Vancouver's Island and the mainland so as to make that island
entirely British. The Mexican War was now coming on. It would
hardly do to have two wars at one time. So the United States gave
way and a treaty was signed in 1846. Instead of "all Oregon," the
United States received about one-half. But it was a splendid region
and included not merely the present state of Oregon, but all the
territory west of the Rocky Mountains between the forty-second and
the forty-ninth parallels of latitude.
CHAPTER 33
THE COMPROMISE OF 1850
Should Oregon and Mexican cessions be free
soil?
The Wilmot Proviso. McMaster, 324.
340. The Wilmot Proviso, 1846.--What should be done with
Oregon and with the immense territory received from Mexico? Should
it be free soil or should it be slave soil? To understand the
history of the dispute which arose out of this question we must go
back a bit and study the Wilmot Proviso. Even before the Mexican
War was fairly begun, this question came before Congress. Every one
admitted that Texas must be a slave state. Most people were agreed
that Oregon would be free soil. For it was too far north for
negroes to thrive. But what should be done with California and with
New Mexico? David Wilmot of Pennsylvania thought that they should
be free soil. He was a member of the House of Representatives. In
1846 he moved to add to a bill giving the President money to
purchase land from Mexico a proviso that none of the territory to
be acquired at the national expense should be open to slavery. This
proviso was finally defeated. But the matter was one on which
people held very strong opinions, and the question became the most
important issue in the election of 1848.
[Illustration: ZACHARY TAYLOR.]
Candidates for the presidency, 1848.
"Squatter sovereignty."
Free Soil party. McMaster, 334-335.
Taylor and Fillmore elected.
341. Taylor elected President, 1848.--Three candidates
contested the election of 1848. First there was Lewis Cass of
Michigan, the Democratic candidate. He was in favor of "squatter
sovereignty," that is, allowing the people of each territory to
have slavery or not as they chose. The Whig candidate was General
Taylor, the victor of Buena Vista. The Whigs put forth no statement
of principles. The third candidate was Martin Van Buren, already
once President. Although a Democrat, he did not favor the extension
of slavery. He was nominated by Democrats who did not believe in
"squatter sovereignty," and by a new party which called itself the
Free Soil party. The abolitionists or Liberty party also nominated
a candidate, but he withdrew in favor of Van Buren. The Whigs had
nominated Millard Fillmore of New York for Vice-President. He
attracted to the Whig ticket a good many votes in New York. Van
Buren also drew a good many votes from the Democrats. In this way
New York was carried for Taylor and Fillmore. This decided the
election, and the Whig candidates were chosen.
[Illustration: THE SITE OF SAN FRANCISCO IN 1847. From an
original drawing.]
Discovery of gold in California, 1848.
The "rush" to California, 1849. McMaster, 337-338;
Source-Book, 276-279.
342. California.--Before the treaty of peace with Mexico
was ratified, even before it was signed, gold was discovered in
California. Reports of the discovery soon reached the towns on the
western seacoast. At once men left whatever they were doing and
hastened to the hills to dig for gold. Months later rumors of this
discovery began to reach the eastern part of the United States. At
first people paid little attention to them. But when President Polk
said that gold had been found, people began to think that it must
be true. Soon hundreds of gold-seekers started for California. Then
thousands became eager to go. These first comers were called the
Forty-Niners, because most of them came in the year 1849. By the
end of that year there were eighty thousand immigrants in
California.
California constitutional convention, 1849.
Slavery forbidden.
343. California seeks Admission to the Union.--There were
eighty thousand white people in California, and they had almost no
government of any kind. So in November, 1849, they held a
convention, drew up a constitution, and demanded admission the
Union as a state. The peculiar thing about this constitution was
that it forbade slavery in California. Many of the Forty-Niners
were Southerners. But even they did not want slavery. The reason
was that they wished to dig in the earth and win gold. They would
not allow slave holders to work their mining claims with slave
labor, for free white laborers had never been able to work
alongside of negro slaves. So they did not want slavery in
California.
Divisions on the question of the extension of
slavery. McMaster, 335-336.
344. A Divided Country.--This action of the people of
California at once brought the question of slavery before the
people. Many Southerners were eager to found a slave confederacy
apart from the Union. Many abolitionists were eager to found a free
republic in the North. Many Northerners, who loved the Union,
thought that slavery should be confined to the states where it
existed. They thought that slavery should not be permitted in the
territories, which belonged to the people of the United States as a
whole. They argued that if the territories could be kept free, the
people of those territories, when they came to form state
constitutions, would forbid slavery as the people of California had
just done. They were probably right, and for this very reason the
Southerners wished to have slavery in the territories. So strong
was the feeling over these points that it seemed as if the Union
would split into pieces.
Taylor's policy.
California demands admission.
345. President Taylor's Policy.--General Taylor was now
President. He was alarmed by the growing excitement. He determined
to settle the matter at once before people could get any more
excited. So he sent agents to California and to New Mexico to urge
the people to demand admission to the Union at once. When Congress
met in 1850, he stated that California demanded admission as a free
state. The Southerners were angry. For they had thought that
California would surely be a slave state.
Clay's compromise scheme, 1850. McMaster,
339-341; Source-Book, 279-281.
346. Clay's Compromise Plan.--Henry Clay now stepped
forward to bring about a "union of hearts." His plan was to end all
disputes between Northerners and Southerners by having the people
of each section give way to the people of the other section. For
example, the Southerners were to permit the admission of California
as a free state, and to consent to the abolition of the slave trade
in the District of Columbia. In return, the Northerners were to
give way to the Southerners on all other points. They were to allow
slavery in the District of Columbia. They were to consent to the
organization of New Mexico and Utah as territories without any
provision for or against slavery. Texas claimed that a part of the
proposed Territory of New Mexico belonged to her. So Clay suggested
that the United States should pay Texas for this land. Finally Clay
proposed that Congress should pass a severe Fugitive Slave Act. It
is easily seen that Clay's plan as a whole was distinctly favorable
to the South. Few persons favored the passage of the whole scheme.
But when votes were taken on each part separately, they all passed.
In the midst of the excitement over this compromise President
Taylor died, and Millard Fillmore, the Vice-President, became
President.
[Illustration: MILLARD FILLMORE.]
Art. IV, sec. 2.
Fugitive Slave Act of 1793.
Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. McMaster, 341-343.
Results of passage of this act. Higginson, 281;
Source-Book, 282-284.
round Railway." Source-Book, 260-263.
347. The Fugitive Slave Act.--The Constitution provides
that persons held to service in one state escaping into another
state shall be delivered up upon claim of the person to whom such
service may be due. Congress, in 1793, had passed an act to carry
out this provision of the Constitution. But this law had seldom
been enforced, because its enforcement had been left to the states,
and public opinion in the North was opposed to the return of
fugitive slaves. The law of 1850 gave the enforcement of the act to
United States officials. The agents of slave owners claimed many
persons as fugitives. But few were returned to the South. The
important result of these attempts to enforce the law was to
strengthen Northern public opinion against slavery. It led to
redoubled efforts to help runaway slaves through the Northern
states to Canada. A regular system was established. This was called
the "Underground Railway." In short, instead of bringing about "a
union of hearts," the Compromise of 1850 increased the ill feeling
between the people of the two sections of the country.
"Uncle Tom's Cabin."
Effects of this book.
348. "Uncle Tom's Cabin."--It was at this time that Mrs.
Harriet Beecher Stowe wrote "Uncle Tom's Cabin." In this story she
set forth the pleasant side of slavery--the light-heartedness and
kind-heartedness of the negroes. In it she also set forth the
unpleasant side of slavery--the whipping of human beings, the
selling of human beings, the hunting of human beings. Of course,
there never was such a slave as Uncle Tom. The story is simply a
wonderful picture of slavery as it appeared to a brilliant woman of
the North. Hundreds of thousands of copies of this book were sold
in the South as well as in the North. Plays founded on the book
were acted on the stage. Southern people when reading "Uncle Tom"
thought little of the unpleasant things in it: they liked the
pleasant things in it. Northern people laughed at the pretty
pictures of plantation life: they were moved to tears by the tales
of cruelty. "Uncle Tom's Cabin" and the Fugitive Slave Law
convinced the people of the North that bounds must be set to the
extension of slavery.
CHAPTER 34
THE STRUGGLE FOR KANSAS
Campaign of 1852.
Pierce elected President.
349. Pierce elected President, 1852.--It was now Campaign
time for a new election. The Whigs had been successful with two old
soldiers, so they thought they would try again with another soldier
and nominated General Winfield Scott, the conqueror of Mexico. The
Democrats also nominated a soldier, Franklin Pierce of New
Hampshire, who had been in northern Mexico with Taylor. The
Democrats and Whigs both said that they would stand by the
Compromise of 1850. But many voters thought that there would be
less danger of excitement with a Democrat in the White House and
voted for Pierce for that reason. They soon found that they were
terribly mistaken in their belief.
The Nebraska bill, 1854. Source-Book,
284-287.
Douglas asserts Compromise of 1820 to be repealed.
350. Douglas's Nebraska Bill.--President Pierce began his
term of office quietly enough. But in 1854 Senator Douglas of
Illinois brought in a bill to organize the Territory of Nebraska.
It will be remembered that in 1820 Missouri had been admitted to
the Union as a slave state. In 1848 Iowa had been admitted as a
free state. North of Iowa was the free Territory of Minnesota.
Westward from Missouri, Iowa, and Minnesota was an immense region
without any government of any kind. It all lay north of the
compromise line of 1820 (p. 222), and had been forever devoted to
freedom by that compromise. But Douglas said that the Compromise of
1820 had been repealed by the Compromise of 1850. So he proposed
that the settlers of Nebraska should say whether that territory
should be free soil or slave soil, precisely as if the Compromise
of 1820 had never been passed. Instantly there was a tremendous
uproar.
[Illustration: FRANKLIN PIERCE.]
The Kansas-Nebraska Act, 1854.
Antislavery senators attack the bill.
The Independent Democrats.
351. The Kansas-Nebraska Act, 1854.--Douglas now changed
his bill so as to provide for the formation of two territories. One
of these he named Kansas. It had nearly the same boundaries as the
present state of Kansas, except that it extended westward to the
Rocky Mountains. The other territory was named Nebraska. It
included all the land north of Kansas and between the Missouri
River and the Rocky Mountains. The antislavery leaders in the North
attacked the bill with great fury. Chase of Ohio said that it was a
violation of faith. Sumner of Massachusetts rejoiced in the fight,
for he said men must now take sides for freedom or for slavery.
Some, independent Democrats published "An Appeal." They asked their
fellow-citizens to take their maps and see what an immense region
Douglas had proposed to open to slavery. They denied that the
Missouri Compromise had been repealed. Nevertheless, the bill
passed Congress and was signed by President Pierce.
[Illustration: Territory opened to slavery.]
Abraham Lincoln, Hero Tales, 325-335.
Aroused by the Kansas-Nebraska Act.
352. Abraham Lincoln.--Born in Kentucky, Abraham Lincoln
went with his parents to Indiana and then to Illinois. As a boy he
was very poor and had to work hard. But he lost no opportunity to
read and to study. At the plow or in the long evenings at home by
the firelight he was ever thinking and studying. Growing to manhood
he became a lawyer and served one term in Congress. The passage of
the Kansas-Nebraska Act aroused his indignation as nothing had ever
aroused it before. He denied that any man had the right to govern
another man, be he white or be he black, without that man's
consent. He thought that blood would surely be shed before the
slavery question would be settled in Kansas, and the first shedding
of blood would be the beginning of the end of the Union.
Seward's challenge to the Southerners.
McMaster, 347-351.
The Sons of the South.
Fraudulent election. Source-Book, 287-289.
353. Settlement of Kansas.--In the debate on the
Kansas-Nebraska bill Senator Seward of New York said to the
Southerners: "Come on, then.... We will engage in competition for
the soil of Kansas, and God give the victory to the side that is
strong in numbers as it is in right." Seward spoke truly. The
victory came to those opposed to the extension of slavery. But it
was a long time in coming. As soon as the act was passed, armed
"Sons of the South" crossed the frontier of Missouri and founded
the town of Atchison. Then came large bands of armed settlers from
the North and the East. They founded the towns of Lawrence and
Topeka. An election was held. Hundreds of men poured over the
boundary of Missouri, outvoted the free-soil settlers in Kansas,
and then went home. The territorial legislature, chosen in this
way, adopted the laws of Missouri, slave code and all, as the laws
of Kansas. It seemed as if Kansas were lost to freedom.
Free-state constitution.
The Senate refuses to admit Kansas.
354. The Topeka Convention.--The free-state voters now
held a convention at Topeka. They drew up a constitution and
applied to Congress for admission to the Union as the free state of
Kansas. The free-state men and the slave-state men each elected a
Delegate to Congress. The House of Representatives now took the
matter up and appointed a committee of investigation. The committee
reported in favor of the free-state men, and the House voted to
admit Kansas as a free state. But the Senate would not consent to
anything of the kind. The contest in Kansas went on and became more
bitter every month.
Origin of the Republican party. McMaster,
352-355.
Anti-Nebraska men.
355. The Republican Party.--The most important result of
the Kansas-Nebraska fight was the formation of the Republican
party. It was made up of men from all the other parties who agreed
in opposing Douglas's Kansas-Nebraska policy. Slowly they began to
think of themselves as a party and to adopt the name of the old
party of Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe--Republican.
Presidential candidates, 1856.
Buchanan.
Frémont.
356. Buchanan elected President, 1856.--The Whigs and the
Know-Nothings nominated Millard Fillmore for President and said
nothing about slavery. The Democrats nominated James Buchanan of
Pennsylvania for President and John C. Breckinridge of Kentucky for
Vice-President. They declared their approval of the Kansas-Nebraska
Act and favored a strict construction of the Constitution. The
Republicans nominated John C. Frémont. They protested
against the extension of slavery and declared for a policy of
internal improvements at the expense of the nation. The Democrats
won; but the Republicans carried all the Northern states save
four.
Dred Scott decision, 1857. McMaster,
355-357; Source-Book, 290-291.
Opinions of the judges.
357. The Dred Scott Decision, 1857.--The Supreme Court of
the United States now gave a decision in the Dred Scott case that
put an end to all hope of compromise on the slavery question. Dred
Scott had been born a slave. The majority of the judges declared
that a person once a slave could never become a citizen of the
United States and bring suit in the United States courts. They also
declared that the Missouri Compromise was unlawful. Slave owners
had a clear right to carry their property, including slaves, into
the territories, and Congress could not stop them.
Lincoln's policy.
His debates with Douglas. McMaster, 388-389;
Source-Book, 290-294.
358. The Lincoln and Douglas Debates, 1858.--The question
of the reëlection of Douglas to the Senate now came before the
people of Illinois. Abraham Lincoln stepped forward to contest the
election with him. "A house divided against itself cannot stand,"
said Lincoln. "This government cannot endure half slave and half
free.... It will become all one thing or all the other." He
challenged Douglas to debate the issues with him before the people,
and Douglas accepted the challenge. Seven joint debates were held
in the presence of immense crowds. Lincoln forced Douglas to defend
the doctrine of "popular sovereignty." This Douglas did by
declaring that the legislatures of the territories could make laws
hostile to slavery. This idea, of course, was opposed to the Dred
Scott decision. Douglas won the election and was returned to the
Senate. But Lincoln had made a national reputation.
[Illustration: HARPER'S FERRY.]
Civil war in Kansas. McMaster, 357.
John Brown.
The slave constitution.
Douglas opposes Buchanan.
359. "Bleeding Kansas."--Meantime civil war had broken
out in Kansas, Slavery men attacked Lawrence, killed a few
free-state settlers, and burned several buildings. Led by John
Brown, an immigrant from New York, free-state men attacked a party
of slave-state men and killed five of them. By 1857 the free-state
voters had become so numerous that it was no longer possible to
outvote them by bringing men from Missouri, and they chose a
free-state legislature. But the fraudulent slave-state legislature
had already provided for holding a constitutional convention at
Lecompton. This convention was controlled by the slave-state men
and adopted a constitution providing for slavery. President
Buchanan sent this constitution to Congress and asked to have
Kansas admitted as a slave state. But Douglas could not bear to see
the wishes of the settlers of Kansas outraged. He opposed the
proposition vigorously and it was defeated. It was not until 1861
that Kansas was admitted to the Union as a free state.
John Brown's Raid, 1859. Higginson, 286-289;
Source-Book, 294-296.
He seizes Harper's Ferry.
His execution, 1859.
360. John Brown's Raid, 1859.--While in Kansas John Brown
had conceived a bold plan. It was to seize a strong place in the
mountains of the South, and there protect any slaves who should run
away from their masters. In this way he expected to break slavery
in pieces within two years. With only nineteen men he seized
Harper's Ferry, in Virginia, and secured the United States arsenal
at that place. But he and most of his men were immediately
captured. He was executed by the Virginian authorities as a traitor
and murderer. The Republican leaders denounced his act as "the
gravest of crimes." But the Southern leaders were convinced that
now the time had come to secede from the Union and to establish a
Southern Confederacy.
QUESTIONS AND TOPICS
CHAPTER 31
§ 323.--a. Why were the people of South Carolina so
opposed to any limitation of slavery? How did they show their
opposition?
b. Had slavery disappeared in the North because people
thought that it was wrong?
§§ 324, 325.--a. What suggestions were made by
some in the North for the ending of slavery? What do you think of
these suggestions?
b. For what did Garrison contend, and how did he make his
views known? Why were these views opposed in the North?
§ 326.--a. Why were the Southerners so alarmed by
Nat Turner's Rebellion?
b. What power had Congress over the mails? How would you
have voted on this question?
§§ 327, 328.--a. Why is the right of petition
so important? How is this right secured to citizens of the United
States?
b. Why should these petitions be considered as insulting
to slaveholders?
c. Why were the Southerners so afraid of any discussion
of slavery?
CHAPTER 32
§§ 329, 330.--a. Show by the map the extent of
the Mexican Republic.
b. Why did Texas wish to join the United States? What
attitude had Mexico taken on slavery?
§§ 331, 332.--a. Explain carefully how the
Texas question influenced the election of 1844.
b. What was the Liberty party? How did its formation make
the election of Polk possible?
c. What is a "joint resolution"?
§ 333.--How did the Mexicans regard the admission of Texas?
What dispute with Mexico arose? Did Mexico begin the war?
§§ 334, 335.--a. What was the plan of Taylor's
campaign? Of Scott's campaign?
b. Mention the leading battles of Taylor's campaign. Of
Scott's campaign.
§§ 336, 337.--a. What action did the American
settlers in California take? With what result?
b. Explain by a map the Mexican cessions of 1848 and
1853.
§§ 338, 339.--a. What was the extent of Oregon
in 1845?
b. How was the dispute finally settled? Explain by a
map.
c. What was the extent of Oregon in 1847? Is it the same
to-day?
d. Of what value was this region to the United
States?
CHAPTER 33
§§ 340, 341.--a. Why was there little question
whether Oregon would be slave or free?
b. Explain carefully Wilmot's suggestion. What would be
the arguments in Congress for and against this "proviso"?
c. What is meant by "squatter sovereignty"? What do you
think of the wisdom and justice of such a plan?
§§ 342, 343.--a. Describe the discovery of gold
in California and the rush thither. What difference did one
year make in the population of California?
b. What attitude did California take on the slavery
question? Why?
§§ 344, 345.--a. How had the question of
slavery already divided the country?
b. What extreme parties were there in the North and the
South?
c. Why was the question about the territories so
important?
d. What action did President Taylor take? Why? What do
you think of the wisdom of this policy?
§§ 346, 347.--a. State the provisions of Clay's
compromise plan. Which of these favored the North? The South?
b. What law had been made as to fugitive slaves? Why had
it not been enforced? Why was the change made in 1850 so
important?
c. How would you have acted had you been a United States
officer called to carry out the Fugitive Slave Law?
§ 348.--a. Who was Mrs. Stowe? What view did she
take of slavery?
b. Were there any good points in the slave system?
c. Why is this book so important?
CHAPTER 34
§§ 349-351.--a. Who were the candidates in
1852? Who was chosen? Why?
b. What doctrine did Douglas apply to Kansas and
Nebraska?
c. Why did Chase call this bill "a violation of
faith"?
d. Was Douglas a patriot? Chase? Sumner? Pierce?
§ 352.--a. Give an account of the early life and
training of Abraham Lincoln.
b. What did he think of the Kansas-Nebraska Act?
§§ 353, 354.--a. What effect did the
Kansas-Nebraska Act have on the settlement of Kansas?
b. Describe the election. Do you think that laws made by
a legislature so elected were binding?
d. Explain the difference in the attitude of the Senate
and House on the Kansas question.
§§ 355, 356.--a. How was the Republican party
formed? b. Were its principles like or unlike those of the
Republican party of Jefferson's time? Give your reasons.
§ 357.--a. What rights did the Supreme Court declare
a slave could not possess? Was a slave a person or a thing?
b. What power does the Constitution give Congress over a
territory? (Art. IV, Sec. 3.)
§ 358.--a. Explain carefully the quotations from
Lincoln's speeches.
b. Was the doctrine of popular sovereignty necessarily
favorable to slavery? Give illustrations to support your
reasons.
c. Was Douglas's declaration in harmony with the decision
of the Supreme Court?
§§ 359, 360.--a. Compare the attitude of
Douglas and Buchanan upon the admission of Kansas.
b. Describe John Brown's raid. Was he a traitor?
GENERAL QUESTIONS
a. Give, with dates, the important laws as to slavery
since 1783.
b. What were the arguments in favor of the extension of
slavery? Against it?
c. Find and learn a poem against slavery by Whittier,
Lowell, or Longfellow.
d. Make a table of elections since 1788, with the leading
parties, candidates, and principal issues. Underline the name of
the candidate elected.
TOPICS FOR SPECIAL WORK
a. John Brown in Kansas or at Harper's Ferry.
b. The career, to this time, of any man mentioned in
Chapters 33 and 34.
c. Any one fugitive slave case: Jerry McHenry in Syracuse
(A.J. May's Antislavery Conflicts), Shadrach, Anthony
Burns.
SUGGESTIONS
Preparation is especially important in teaching this period. The
teacher will find references to larger books in Channing's
Students' History.
Show how the question of slavery was really at the basis of the
Mexican War. Geographical conditions and the settlement of the
Western country should be carefully noted. A limited use of the
writings and speeches of prominent men and writers is especially
valuable at this point.
Have a large map of the United States in the class room, cut out
and fasten upon this map pieces of white and black paper to
illustrate the effects of legislation under discussion, and also to
illustrate the various elections.
The horrors of slavery should be but lightly touched. Emphasize
especially the fact that slavery prevented rather than aided the
development of the South, and was an evil economically as well as
socially.
|